Use justices in a sentence | example usage from the newswires

Editorial »

How to use the word justices in a Sentence? Page #3

Sample usage from literary quotes and the newswire.

Filter by category:

129 results found

Tonight's decision not only leaves in place a district court ruling that requires the Biden administration to reinstate a program that has been defunct for months, but it also makes clear how much of a difference the change in administration makes when it comes to the justices and immigration policy, of the 28 requests for stays from the Justice Department that The Supreme Court granted during Trump's tenure, 11 were to freeze lower-court injunctions of controversial immigration rules. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 2 years ago
It would be one thing if these justices then turned around and were fair and impartial. However, in scores of democracy cases, they've consistently undermined democracy and aided the very party that appointed them, republicans are using this undemocratic and partisan majority on the court to cement their own power. – Nan Aron	Found on FOX News 2 years ago
Unless there are real reforms to the court, including expanding the number of justices, something completely constitutional and done regularly throughout our history, our system of government and our rights and legal protections will be eroded for generations. – Nan Aron	Found on FOX News 2 years ago
Sullivan provides crucial protection of the independence of news outlets, whose reporting might otherwise be chilled, even for accurate stories, if Supreme Court were easier to sue them for defamation, the more justices who look poised to potentially revisit that precedent in the coming years, the more alarming Justice Thomas's previously idiosyncratic critiques become. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 2 years ago
A reminder that Donald Trump himself said he would pick justices who would overturn the Affordable Care Act, making it quite reasonable for Democrats to hold that against his nominees. – Brian Fallon	Found on FOX News 2 years ago
Today's decision is another victory for religious groups, but not the major one that they sought, the court's three most conservative justices wanted to overturn three decades of precedent and subject virtually all government regulations that even incidentally impact religious practice to the most exacting judicial scrutiny. But Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Barrett appeared unwilling, or at least not yet ready, to make such a move -- resting the decision on narrower grounds. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 2 years ago
Supreme Court justices believe Supreme Court justices will outwork and out-organize them and find ways to overcome voter suppression, that's been the history of Supreme Court justices experience with voting in this country -- having to overcome those barriers. – John Lewis	Found on CNN 2 years ago
But at the end of the day, Supreme Court justices shouldn't have to make history. – John Lewis	Found on CNN 2 years ago
We have too few. If we had 10 more Supreme Court Justices, which is my initial proposal — expanding to 19-member Supreme Court — the court would work more like the lower circuit courts in this country, most of which operate with far more than nine people. – Demand Justice	Found on FOX News 3 years ago
By vacating the decision below and ordering the lower court to dismiss the suit as being moot, the Justices avoided either tacitly endorsing or rejecting the lower court's analysis, leaving no federal precedent to govern the question of whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court was allowed to extend the deadline for receipt of mail-in ballots last fall. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 3 years ago
It's not just about whether this insane bill becomes law, part of the point here are the threats themselves. The left wants a sword dangling over the justices when they weigh the facts in every case. – Mitch McConnell	Found on FOX News 3 years ago
Let's see whether or not somebody has the courage, whether it's legislators or legislatures or a justice of the The Pennsylvania Supreme Court or a number of justices of The Pennsylvania Supreme Court. – Donald TrumpThe	Found on CNN 3 years ago
We saw earlier this year that, even though four of the current justices are ready to take up a number of Second Amendment cases, they weren't sure if they had a fifth vote on the merits -- because they weren't sure about the chief justice, it seems likely that the confirmation of Judge Barrett would remove that uncertainty and open the pipeline to a flurry of Second Amendment cases, perhaps ranging from the constitutionality of criminal felon-in-possession statutes to large-capacity magazine bans. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 3 years ago
I would not get into court packing, we add three justices ; next time around, we lose control, they add three justices. We begin to lose any credibility Supreme Court has at all. – Kamala Harris	Found on CNN 3 years ago
The result is not especially surprising given the uphill battle The Federal Government faced in defending such a content - based speech restriction. But the implications of the Court's decision to save the rest of the statute are potentially quite significant, how courts should treat the rest of a statute when one provision is unconstitutional is at the heart of the major Obamacare challenge the Justices are set to hear next fall. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 3 years ago
Given the potential implications of a holding that electors could vote for anyone they chose, it's not surprising that the justices held that states can prevent them from doing so, the only surprise is the unanimous vote in cases at least some expected to divide The Supreme Court. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 3 years ago
Today's decision reflects a significant step away from the idea of independent executive branch agencies, although the court limited its holding to whether a single director of The CFPB could be protected from being fired by the President for any reason, its analysis makes clear that a majority of the current Justices are skeptical of any independence within the executive branch -- which could open the door to even broader and more significant challenges to older -- and less controversial -- agencies going forward. – Supreme Court	Found on CNN 3 years ago
I think it's important that Some GOP senators recognize that all Americans have equal rights under Some GOP senators Constitution, i want to have justices who look at these cases and make decisions based on their review of the case and look at the constitution and apply it equally. – Deb Fischer	Found on CNN 3 years ago
Now we have no plan and no protections for the people of Wisconsin, when you have more people in a small space -- I don't care if it's bars, restaurants or your home -- you're going to be able to spread the virus. And so now, today, thanks to the Republican legislators who convinced four Supreme Court justices to not look at the law but look at their political careers I guess -- it's a bad day for Wisconsin. – Tony Evers	Found on CNN 4 years ago
When you argue in person, you have a better understanding of what is being understood by the court, it's about being in the same room and watching the reactions of the justices. – Lawrence Lessig	Found on Reuters 4 years ago
In keeping with public health guidance in response to Covid-19, the justices and counsel will all participate remotely. – Supreme Court	Found on CNN 4 years ago
This is now the 24th time that the Trump administration has asked The Court to put a lower court decision on hold in less than three years compared to a total of eight such requests during the 16 years of the George W. Bush and Obama administration's combined, as in this case, the justices have often agreed to these requests even when the lower court ruling, as in the most recent case, had only a local impact. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 4 years ago
Because the Court of Appeals did not reach the larger question of whether Affordable Care Act must now fall, and instead remanded that to the district court, Supreme Court will face far less pressure to take Affordable Care Act now -- versus waiting until Affordable Care Act comes back after that remand, thus, among other things, today's ruling may allow the justices to dodge -- if they want to, anyway. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 4 years ago
Although this case is abortion-related, the plaintiffs' challenge was that the law violated the free speech rights of the doctors, as opposed to the abortion rights of the patients, in that regard, although many find the Kentucky law offensive, it doesn't implicate the same fundamental questions about the continuing scope of the right to choose that the justices identified in Roe as other cases already on the court's docket this term and coming down the pipeline. – Steve Vladeck	Found on CNN 4 years ago

Tonight's decision not only leaves in place a district court ruling that requires the Biden administration to reinstate a program that has been defunct for months, but it also makes clear how much of a difference the change in administration makes when it comes to the justices and immigration policy, of the 28 requests for stays from the Justice Department that The Supreme Court granted during Trump's tenure, 11 were to freeze lower-court injunctions of controversial immigration rules.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
2 years ago

It would be one thing if these justices then turned around and were fair and impartial. However, in scores of democracy cases, they've consistently undermined democracy and aided the very party that appointed them, republicans are using this undemocratic and partisan majority on the court to cement their own power.

– Nan Aron

Found on FOX News
2 years ago

Unless there are real reforms to the court, including expanding the number of justices, something completely constitutional and done regularly throughout our history, our system of government and our rights and legal protections will be eroded for generations.

– Nan Aron

Found on FOX News
2 years ago

Sullivan provides crucial protection of the independence of news outlets, whose reporting might otherwise be chilled, even for accurate stories, if Supreme Court were easier to sue them for defamation, the more justices who look poised to potentially revisit that precedent in the coming years, the more alarming Justice Thomas's previously idiosyncratic critiques become.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
2 years ago

A reminder that Donald Trump himself said he would pick justices who would overturn the Affordable Care Act, making it quite reasonable for Democrats to hold that against his nominees.

– Brian Fallon

Found on FOX News
2 years ago

Today's decision is another victory for religious groups, but not the major one that they sought, the court's three most conservative justices wanted to overturn three decades of precedent and subject virtually all government regulations that even incidentally impact religious practice to the most exacting judicial scrutiny. But Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Barrett appeared unwilling, or at least not yet ready, to make such a move -- resting the decision on narrower grounds.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
2 years ago

Supreme Court justices believe Supreme Court justices will outwork and out-organize them and find ways to overcome voter suppression, that's been the history of Supreme Court justices experience with voting in this country -- having to overcome those barriers.

– John Lewis

Found on CNN
2 years ago

But at the end of the day, Supreme Court justices shouldn't have to make history.

– John Lewis

Found on CNN
2 years ago

We have too few. If we had 10 more Supreme Court Justices, which is my initial proposal — expanding to 19-member Supreme Court — the court would work more like the lower circuit courts in this country, most of which operate with far more than nine people.

– Demand Justice

Found on FOX News
3 years ago

By vacating the decision below and ordering the lower court to dismiss the suit as being moot, the Justices avoided either tacitly endorsing or rejecting the lower court's analysis, leaving no federal precedent to govern the question of whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court was allowed to extend the deadline for receipt of mail-in ballots last fall.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
3 years ago

It's not just about whether this insane bill becomes law, part of the point here are the threats themselves. The left wants a sword dangling over the justices when they weigh the facts in every case.

– Mitch McConnell

Found on FOX News
3 years ago

Let's see whether or not somebody has the courage, whether it's legislators or legislatures or a justice of the The Pennsylvania Supreme Court or a number of justices of The Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

– Donald TrumpThe

Found on CNN
3 years ago

We saw earlier this year that, even though four of the current justices are ready to take up a number of Second Amendment cases, they weren't sure if they had a fifth vote on the merits -- because they weren't sure about the chief justice, it seems likely that the confirmation of Judge Barrett would remove that uncertainty and open the pipeline to a flurry of Second Amendment cases, perhaps ranging from the constitutionality of criminal felon-in-possession statutes to large-capacity magazine bans.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
3 years ago

I would not get into court packing, we add three justices ; next time around, we lose control, they add three justices. We begin to lose any credibility Supreme Court has at all.

– Kamala Harris

Found on CNN
3 years ago

The result is not especially surprising given the uphill battle The Federal Government faced in defending such a content - based speech restriction. But the implications of the Court's decision to save the rest of the statute are potentially quite significant, how courts should treat the rest of a statute when one provision is unconstitutional is at the heart of the major Obamacare challenge the Justices are set to hear next fall.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
3 years ago

Given the potential implications of a holding that electors could vote for anyone they chose, it's not surprising that the justices held that states can prevent them from doing so, the only surprise is the unanimous vote in cases at least some expected to divide The Supreme Court.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
3 years ago

Today's decision reflects a significant step away from the idea of independent executive branch agencies, although the court limited its holding to whether a single director of The CFPB could be protected from being fired by the President for any reason, its analysis makes clear that a majority of the current Justices are skeptical of any independence within the executive branch -- which could open the door to even broader and more significant challenges to older -- and less controversial -- agencies going forward.

– Supreme Court

Found on CNN
3 years ago

I think it's important that Some GOP senators recognize that all Americans have equal rights under Some GOP senators Constitution, i want to have justices who look at these cases and make decisions based on their review of the case and look at the constitution and apply it equally.

– Deb Fischer

Found on CNN
3 years ago

Now we have no plan and no protections for the people of Wisconsin, when you have more people in a small space -- I don't care if it's bars, restaurants or your home -- you're going to be able to spread the virus. And so now, today, thanks to the Republican legislators who convinced four Supreme Court justices to not look at the law but look at their political careers I guess -- it's a bad day for Wisconsin.

– Tony Evers

Found on CNN
4 years ago

When you argue in person, you have a better understanding of what is being understood by the court, it's about being in the same room and watching the reactions of the justices.

– Lawrence Lessig

Found on Reuters
4 years ago

In keeping with public health guidance in response to Covid-19, the justices and counsel will all participate remotely.

– Supreme Court

Found on CNN
4 years ago

This is now the 24th time that the Trump administration has asked The Court to put a lower court decision on hold in less than three years compared to a total of eight such requests during the 16 years of the George W. Bush and Obama administration's combined, as in this case, the justices have often agreed to these requests even when the lower court ruling, as in the most recent case, had only a local impact.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
4 years ago

Because the Court of Appeals did not reach the larger question of whether Affordable Care Act must now fall, and instead remanded that to the district court, Supreme Court will face far less pressure to take Affordable Care Act now -- versus waiting until Affordable Care Act comes back after that remand, thus, among other things, today's ruling may allow the justices to dodge -- if they want to, anyway.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
4 years ago

Although this case is abortion-related, the plaintiffs' challenge was that the law violated the free speech rights of the doctors, as opposed to the abortion rights of the patients, in that regard, although many find the Kentucky law offensive, it doesn't implicate the same fundamental questions about the continuing scope of the right to choose that the justices identified in Roe as other cases already on the court's docket this term and coming down the pipeline.

– Steve Vladeck

Found on CNN
4 years ago

Discuss these sample sentences with the community:

0 Comments

Notify me of new comments via email.

Editorial »

How to use the word justices in a Sentence? Page #3

Sample usage from literary quotes and the newswire.

129 results found

Discuss these sample sentences with the community:

0 Comments

Are we missing a good definition for justices? Don't keep it to yourself...

Word of the Day

Would you like us to send you a FREE new word definition delivered to your inbox daily?

The Web's Largest Resource for

Definitions & Translations

A Member Of The STANDS4 Network

Free, no signup required:

Add to Chrome

Free, no signup required:

Add to Firefox

Browse Definitions.net

Quiz

Are you a words master?

restoring confidence and relieving anxiety