Definitions for us government
us gov·ern·ment

Princeton's WordNetRate this definition:0.0 / 0 votes

1. United States government, United States, U.S. government, US Government, U.S.noun

   the executive and legislative and judicial branches of the federal government of the United States

ChatGPTRate this definition:0.0 / 0 votes

1. us government

   The US government is the federal political system established by the US Constitution, consisting of three separate branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. It is a democratic republic where elected officials represent the people and the President is the head of state. Its primary function is to maintain law and order, protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens, regulate economic activity, provide public services, and conduct relations with other states. Ultimately, it governs the entirety of the United States and its territories.

Matched Categories

1. • Federal Government

How to pronounce us government?

1. Alex

   US English

   David

   US English

   Mark

   US English

   Daniel

   British

   Libby

   British

   Mia

   British

   Karen

   Australian

   Hayley

   Australian

   Natasha

   Australian

   Veena

   Indian

   Priya

   Indian

   Neerja

   Indian

   Zira

   US English

   Oliver

   British

   Wendy

   British

   Fred

   US English

   Tessa

   South African

How to say us government in sign language?

Numerology

1. Chaldean Numerology

   The numerical value of us government in Chaldean Numerology is: 1

2. Pythagorean Numerology

   The numerical value of us government in Pythagorean Numerology is: 2

Examples of us government in a Sentence

1. Zac Goldsmith:

   I don't believe the government is going to give the green light to Heathrow expansion.

2. Consumer Union Schwantes:

   The organization noted that nearly 50,000 consumers joined an online petition last month favoring the FCC's privacy rules. And in a nationally representative CR Consumer Voices Survey, 65 percent of Americans said they were either slightly or not at all confident that their personal data is private and not distributed without their knowledge. Florida Sen. Bill Nelson before the vote on Wednesday said the rules put American consumers — each one of us who pay these monthly fees for their broadband service — in the driver's seat of how our personal data is used and shared. Is that too much to ask ? I don't think so. The resolution will still have to pass the House of Representatives, which it is likely to do, and then be signed by President Trump. ISPs have been under the FCC's jurisdiction only since 2015, when they werereclassified as public utilitiesunder something called Title II of the Communications Act. Meantime, web-based companies such as Amazon and Google are regulated by the Federal Trade Commission( FTC), and face less stringent requirements. Republican legislators and lobbyists from cable, telecom, and advertising industries say that difference in regulation is unfair. Sen. John Thune( R-SD) said Wednesday that the FCC had unfairly distorted the marketplace when it imposed unnecessarily onerous privacy restrictions on broadband providers while leaving the rest of the internet under the strong and successful regime at the FTC. The federal government could move authority over ISPs back to the FCC. However, that would be a complex process, and one not favored by advocacy groups, including Consumers Union. Any fondness for the FTC’s approach to privacy is merely support for dramatically weaker privacy protections favored by most corporations, the organization wrote in a letter to senators earlier this week. There is no question that consumers favor the FCC’s current broadband privacy rules. The measure passed by a 50-48 vote along party lines The Senate Thursday. To roll back the rules, Republican senators employed a legislative maneuver that prevents the FCC from adopting ‘ similar ’ rules, even far weaker ones, to protect internet users in the future.

3. Herry Purnomo:

   The fires have been happening for 20 years, and I don't believe the governments are stupid, so I suspect that people are trying to influence the government not to have enough budget to stop them, because fires benefit (various) people.

4. Lawrence Hashish:

   Plus, he added, the gun was a fake. There’s no evidence and the government can not prove it’s a real gun, lawrence Hashish would know better than to put Lawrence Hashish in that position with a real gun, but Lawrence Hashish felt that since this was fake it would mean nothing. Lawrence Hashish had nothing to worry about. It’s like having a water pistol.

5. Mohammad Javad Zarif:

   (The) UK government has been complicit in the U.S. economic terrorism against Iran.

References

1. ^ Princeton's WordNet
   http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=us government
2. ^ ChatGPT
   https://chat.openai.com